This is a thorough review and discussion of ways sport performance can and have been enhanced - drugs, swimsuits, prosthesis, bats, balls, etc. The main conclusion is that there are no clear lines when it comes to how fair it is that technoscientific advancements have changed sports. What is "natural" is murky. The dichotomy the author exams is the myth of the primacy of the body versus the incursion of all sorts of technoscientific factors.It is a look at the complexity of the interaction between athletes, the fans, and those who make money from sport. It a written in a fairly complex style, perhaps "academic" style captures it. Very readable, but the author covers many ideas with many runs at explanations. And he beats the word technoscientific into a reader's head until you either find the concept and word feeling familiar or you start laughing at the number of repetitions. The intro is a particularly good example of this.I can see a budding owner of a sports team reading this to get a grasp on the "politics" and marketing complexity of their new venture. I can also see this as a great primer for athletes considering turning pro and wanting to understand how they will be viewed by other actors in the sport community. I can see sports journalist reading it to present a more balanced viewpoint on what's fair and how every athlete bring their own "unfair" strengths and weaknesses to the competition.I'm glad I read it. I had my perceptions of "fair" and "natural" adjusted in a more openminded direction.